R&D Tax Credit
Does My Company Qualify for the R&D Tax Credit?

Many business owners hear “research and development” and picture laboratories, patents, and scientists in white coats. But the federal research credit can apply to much more ordinary-looking technical work: developing software, improving a manufacturing process, testing a new design, reformulating a product, or solving an engineering problem when the answer was not obvious at the outset.
The important question is not whether your company calls the work “R&D.” It is whether the underlying activities satisfy the tax rules. If your team spends time evaluating technical alternatives, testing possible solutions, and working through uncertainty, the credit may be worth a closer look.
The four-part test, in plain English
For an activity to qualify for the federal research credit under Internal Revenue Code Section 41, it generally must satisfy all four parts of the IRS test. The test applies to the specific business component being developed or improved—not the company as a whole.
1.
The activity must involve qualifying research or experimental work.
The activity must involve research or experimental expenditures of the type covered by Section 174A for domestic research.
2.
The work must be technological in nature.
The process must fundamentally rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.
3.
The information must be useful in developing or improving a business component.
A business component can include a product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention used in your business or held for sale, lease, or license.
4.
There must be a process of experimentation for a qualified purpose.
The team must evaluate alternatives to address uncertainty about capability, method, or appropriate design, and the work must relate to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.
In practical terms, a useful starting question is this: Did your team face a technical uncertainty and evaluate different ways to resolve it? If so, there may be something worth analyzing. A successful project isn’t required, but doing technical work alone isn’t enough either.
Activities that may qualify
Potentially qualifying work appears across many industries. Examples can include:
·
Software and technology: developing new applications or features, improving performance or security, building integrations, or evaluating different technical architectures.
·
Manufacturing: designing or improving products, developing production processes, testing materials, improving tooling, or addressing technical issues involving quality or performance.
·
Engineering and construction: evaluating alternative designs, solving site-specific technical problems, or developing improved systems or methods.
·
Food and beverage: reformulating products, testing shelf-life or production methods, or evaluating technical alternatives when scaling a formulation for production.
·
Other industries: automating a process, integrating systems, or engineering a solution where the capability, method, or appropriate design was genuinely uncertain.
These examples are not automatically qualified research. The facts matter, and each activity still has to satisfy the Section 41 requirements and avoid the statutory exclusions.
Work that generally does not qualify
The credit is not intended for every development or improvement project. Examples of excluded or weak candidates can include:
· Routine or predictable work with no meaningful technical uncertainty.
· Aesthetic, stylistic, cosmetic, or seasonal design changes.
· Market research, management studies, surveys, or similar nontechnical work.
· Certain adaptation or duplication of an existing business component.
· Certain research performed after commercial production has begun.
· Research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities.
·
Research conducted outside the United States or a U.S. territory for purposes of the federal Section 41 research credit.
Additional exclusions and special rules apply—including rules for funded research and certain internal-use software—so a project-by-project review is important.
Why the credit can matter
A tax credit is different from a deduction. A deduction generally reduces taxable income; a credit generally reduces tax liability. The research credit amount is not a fixed percentage of current-year R&D spending. It depends on the taxpayer’s qualified research expenses, historical activity, the calculation method used, and other tax attributes.
Many states also have their own research-credit rules. State eligibility, computation, carryforwards, and documentation requirements can differ from the federal rules.
A payroll-tax option for certain startups and small businesses
A qualified small business may be able to elect to use up to $500,000 of its federal research credit against eligible employer payroll-tax liabilities. This can make the credit relevant even when a young company has little or no federal income-tax liability.
In general, the qualified-small-business rules look at whether the business has less than $5 million in gross receipts for the credit year and whether it had gross receipts in the applicable five-year period. The payroll-tax election is limited to five tax years.
The election is made on Form 6765 by the due date of the originally filed income-tax return, including extensions. The credit is then applied through Form 8974 with the applicable employment-tax return. Under current rules, it is applied first against the employer share of Social Security tax, subject to the applicable limitation, and then against the employer share of Medicare tax. Unused amounts can carry forward to a later quarter.
Because timing rules matter, planning before the income-tax return is filed can be especially valuable.
A major change for domestic R&D costs
The tax treatment of research costs changed again in 2025. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2024, Section 174A generally allows taxpayers to currently deduct domestic research or experimental expenditures, including qualifying domestic software-development expenditures. Taxpayers may instead elect to capitalize and amortize those domestic expenditures under the alternatives permitted by the Code.
Foreign research or experimental expenditures remain subject to capitalization and 15-year amortization. Separate transition rules also apply to domestic research costs that were capitalized under the rules in effect for 2022 through 2024.
A special retroactive election was available to certain eligible small businesses for the 2022–2024 period, but the general deadline for that election was July 6, 2026 (and could be earlier if the applicable refund-claim limitations period expired first). That special election window is now closed.
Documentation can make or break the claim
A research-credit claim is only as strong as the facts and records supporting it. Good documentation connects the qualifying activities to the people who performed the work and to the related qualified research expenses.
Depending on the facts, qualified research expenses can include certain employee wages, supplies used in qualified research, and a portion of qualifying contract-research costs. Contemporaneous project records, technical notes, testing results, time or project allocations, and financial records can make the analysis much more reliable than trying to reconstruct everything long after the work is finished.
The goal is not to create paperwork for its own sake. It is to explain what technical uncertainty existed, what alternatives were evaluated, who performed the work, and how the claimed costs relate to those activities.
Is it worth a conversation?
If your company writes software, designs or improves products, develops manufacturing processes, engineers solutions, or regularly works through technical problems where the answer is not obvious at the start, the R&D credit may be worth reviewing.
A good first step is a focused discussion about what your team actually does, followed by a review of the activities against the four-part test and the applicable exclusions. Sometimes the answer is that the credit is not a good fit. Finding that out early is useful, too.
At Atlantis Accounting, we help businesses evaluate whether their activities and costs support an R&D tax credit claim and identify the documentation needed to support it. If you would like to discuss your company’s projects, contact us to schedule a call!
Primary IRS resources
· IRS— Instructions for Form 6765—Credit for Increasing Research Activities
· IRS— Qualified Small Business Payroll Tax Credit for Increasing Research Activities
· IRS— Research Credit Against Payroll Tax for Small Businesses
· IRS— Revenue Procedure 2025-28 / Internal Revenue Bulletin 2025-38— Section 174A transition procedures
· IRS—
Working Families Tax Cuts: Domestic Research or Experimental Expenditures
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and is not tax, legal, or accounting advice. The R&D credit is highly fact-specific, and federal and state rules may change. Consult a qualified tax professional regarding your circumstances.












